Comparison of the effect of sedation and general anesthesia on pattern and flash visual evoked potentials in normal dogs

BMC Vet Res. 2022 Jul 13;18(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03375-5.

Abstract

Background: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) can provide objective functional assessment of the post-retinal visual pathway. This study compared the effects of sedation (butorphanol and dexmedetomidine) and general anesthesia (propofol and sevoflurane) on pattern and flash VEPs. Dogs (n = 13) underwent sedation or anesthesia and VEPs were obtained from 3 subcutaneous recording electrodes placed on the head (O1, Oz, O2).

Results: Pattern VEPs could only be recorded under sedation and a maximum of 3 peaks were identified (N75, P100, N135). Flash VEPs could be recorded under both sedation and anesthesia and a maximum of 5 peaks were identified (N1, P1, N2, P2, N3). The latency of the N1 peak and the baseline-N1 amplitude were significantly longer under general anesthesia.

Conclusion: Visual evoked potentials should be preferentially recorded in dogs sedated with dexmedetomidine and butorphanol, regardless of the stimulus.

Keywords: Butorphanol; Dexmedetomidine; Flash visual evoked potential; Pattern visual evoked potential; Propofol; Sevoflurane.

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia, General / veterinary
  • Animals
  • Butorphanol / pharmacology
  • Dexmedetomidine* / pharmacology
  • Dogs
  • Evoked Potentials, Visual
  • Propofol* / pharmacology

Substances

  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Butorphanol
  • Propofol