Usefulness of Preoperative Planning by Three-Dimensional Planning Software for Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracolumbar Surgeries: Misplacement Rate and Associated Risk Factors

Tomonori Ozaki; Kentaro Yamada; Hiroaki Nakamura

doi:10.22603/ssrr.2021-0185

Usefulness of Preoperative Planning by Three-Dimensional Planning Software for Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracolumbar Surgeries: Misplacement Rate and Associated Risk Factors

Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021 Nov 4;6(3):279-287. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0185. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Tomonori Ozaki^{1

2}, Kentaro Yamada^{1

2}, Hiroaki Nakamura²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Izumi, Japan.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Abstract

Introduction: A number of imaging technologies have been developed to reduce the risk of pedicle screw (PS) misplacement. For example, preoperative three-dimensional (3D) planning can reportedly enhance implant placement accuracy in some orthopedic surgeries. However, no study has investigated the effect of preoperative 3D planning on PS placement without intraoperative 3D navigation. Thus, in this study, we aim to examine the accuracy of PS placement and identify the risk factors for PS misplacement in thoracolumbar surgeries performed using preoperative 3D planning software with intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance in a retrospective study.

Methods: In total, 25 consecutive patients (197 PSs) underwent thoracic or lumbar spinal fusion surgeries using preoperative 3D planning with intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance. PS misplacement was graded based on the degree of perforation (Grade 0, no perforation; Grade 1, <2 mm; Grade 2, 2-4 mm; Grade 3, >4 mm) observed in postoperative computed tomography (CT). Deviations between planned and actual PSs were evaluated by matching preoperative and postoperative CT volume images for each vertebra.

Results: The overall PS misplacement rate was 6.6% (Grade 1: 4.0%, Grade 2: 1.5%, Grade 3: 1.0%). The median linear deviations of PS entry points between planned and actual locations were determined to be 3.3 mm and 3.3 mm for the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. The median angular deviations of the PS axis were 6.2° and 4.5° for the transverse and sagittal planes, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that horizontal deviation of the PS entry point was the sole factor associated with Grade ≥1 PS misplacement (odds ratio=2.47, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Preoperative 3D planning software without intraoperative 3D navigation was able to achieve a relatively low PS misplacement ratio among the reported ratio of conventional techniques without navigation. Surgeons should carefully ensure that the entry point is consistent with preoperative planning, especially in the mediolateral direction to avoid misplacement in this method.

Keywords: Accuracy; Computed tomography; Deviation; Misplacement; Pedicle screw; Planning software; Risk factor; Three-dimensional.