Early intervention with a glycerol throat spray containing cold-adapted cod trypsin after self-diagnosis of common cold: A randomised trial

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270699. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: A glycerol throat spray containing cold-adapted cod trypsin (GCTS) deactivates common cold virus in vitro and decreases pharyngeal rhinovirus load after inoculation in humans. We relied on early self-diagnosis and evaluated two different scales to detect a treatment effect in naturally occurring common colds.

Methods: Adults were enrolled in this randomised, prospective, parallel group, single-blind study to begin treatment six times daily at first sign of a common cold or were assigned to a non-treated group. Jackson's symptom scale and the 9-item Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS)-21 quality of life (QoL) domain were recorded daily by subjects and area under the curve over 12 days (AUC1-12) calculated.

Results: Treatment resulted in reduced symptoms with an AUC1-12 of 45.1 ± 32.5 for Jackson scores compared to 53.8 ± 35.7 in the controls (p = 0.023). AUC1-12 for the 9-item WURSS-21 QoL domain was likewise improved, 113.6 ± 107.7 and 152.7 ± 126.3 (p = 0.006), respectively. During the first four days fewer of the treated subjects (35.3%) used rescue medication than did the control group (50.4%, p = 0.014).

Conclusions: Reduction in common cold symptoms was seen with treatment with a glycerol throat spray containing cold-adapted cod trypsin. This effect was best detected with the 9-item WURSS-21 QoL domain.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Common Cold* / diagnosis
  • Common Cold* / drug therapy
  • Glycerol / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Pharynx
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Rhinovirus
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Trypsin

Substances

  • Trypsin
  • Glycerol

Grants and funding

F.L. was employed by Enzymatica AB when the study was conducted. I.N is employed by Enzymatica AB. J.R. and D.R. have provided consultancy services and have received payment from Enzymatica AB for services rendered. This work was supported by Enzymatica AB.