Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study

Arpana Singh; Mohit Bhatia; Sasi Rekha; Diksha Rani; Pratiksha Kamboj; Deepika Chakraborty; Pratima Gupta

doi:10.7759/cureus.25549

Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study

Cureus. 2022 May 31;14(5):e25549. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25549. eCollection 2022 May.

Authors

Arpana Singh¹, Mohit Bhatia¹, Sasi Rekha¹, Diksha Rani¹, Pratiksha Kamboj¹, Deepika Chakraborty¹, Pratima Gupta¹

Affiliation

¹ Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to explore the diagnostic utility of colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) as a simple and reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing.

Materials and methods: An exploratory study was undertaken in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand, from September 2021 to March 2022, after obtaining approval from the Institute Ethics Committee. Twenty-five non-repetitive carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates were included in the study. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and BD Phoenix M50 system were used to perform species-level identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), respectively, as per the manufacturer's instructions. AST results (including those of colistin) were interpreted as per the CLSI guidelines 2022. The test isolates were further subjected to additional in vitro colistin susceptibility testing using a commercially available Mikrolatest colistin susceptibility testing kit and CBDE, respectively.

Results: The in vitro colistin resistance rates varied from 8% by BD Phoenix system to 20% by Mikrolatest kit and 32% by CBDE, respectively. For colistin susceptibility, a higher CA was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (64.71%) than between the Mikrolatest kit and CBDE (31.60%). Overall, a statistically significant fair agreement was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (Kappa: 0.312; 95% CI: 0.036 to 0.660) and Mikrolatest MIC colistin kit and CBDE (Kappa: 0.286; 95% CI: 0.111 to 0.683), respectively.

Conclusions: In vitro colistin testing remains a significant challenge globally. Although the present study results are inconclusive due to the small sample size, we should conduct multi-centric studies globally, taking a considerable sample size representing different Gram-negative bacilli to generate conclusive evidence on the utility of CBDE as a reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing.

Keywords: broth micro dilution; carbapenem-resistant; colistin broth disk elution; india; klebsiella pneumoniae.