Intraoperative mapping and monitoring during brain tumor surgeries

Handb Clin Neurol. 2022:186:133-149. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819826-1.00013-2.

Abstract

Many different methodologies and paradigms are available to guide surgery of supratentorial tumors with the aim to preserve quality of life of the patients and to increase the extent of tumor resection. Neurophysiologic monitoring techniques (such as different evoked potentials) may help to continuously assess functional integrity of the observed systems and warn about vascular injury. For neurophysiologic mapping methods, the focus is not only to preserve cortical sites, but also to prevent injury to subcortical pathways. Therefore, cortical mapping is not enough but should be combined with subcortical mapping to identify tracts. This may be done by alternating resection and stimulation, or by continuous mapping via an electrified surgical tool such as a stimulating suction tip. Increasingly refined techniques are evolving to improve mapping of complex motor networks as well as language and higher cortical functions. Finally, in deciding between an awake vs asleep intraoperative setting, various factors need to be considered, such as the surgical goal, patient expectation and cooperation, treating team expertise, and neurooncologic aspects including histopathology. Therefore, the choice of protocol depends on the clinical context and the experience of the interdisciplinary team treating the patients.

Keywords: Awake surgery; Brain tumor; Corticospinal tract; Electric stimulation; Glioma; Intraoperative Neurophysiology; Mapping; Motor evoked potential; Somatosensory evoked potential; Visual evoked potential.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Brain Mapping / methods
  • Brain Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Brain Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Humans
  • Neurosurgical Procedures / methods
  • Quality of Life