Objective performance of emergency medical technicians in the use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with subjective self-evaluation: a cross-sectional, simulation-based study

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 29;12(6):e062908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062908.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the subjective and objective resuscitation performance of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) using mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (MCPR) devices.

Design and setting: This was a cross-sectional simulation-based study where participants installed the MCPR device on a training manikin.

Participants: We assessed EMT-Intermediates (EMT-Is) and EMT-Paramedics (EMT-Ps) of the Emergency Medical Services (Ambulance) Division of the Taipei City Fire Department.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was the gap between self-perceived (subjective) and actual (objective) no-flow time during resuscitation, which we hypothesised as statistically insignificant. The secondary outcome was the association between resuscitation performance and personal attributes like knowledge, attitude and self-confidence.

Results: Among 210 participants between 21 and 45 years old, only six were female. There were 144 EMT-Is and 66 EMT-Ps. During a simulated resuscitation lasting between four and a half and 5 min, EMTs had longer actual no-flow time compared with self-perceived no-flow time (subjective, 38 s; objective, 57.5 s; p value<0.001). This discrepancy could cause a 6.5% drop of the chest compression fraction in a resuscitation period of 5 min. Among the EMT personal factors, self-confidence was negatively associated with objective MCPR deployment performance (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.97, p=0.033) and objective teamwork performance (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.97, p=0.037) for EMT-Ps, whereas knowledge was positively associated with objective MCPR deployment performance (aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.52, p=0.002) and objective teamwork performance (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.08, p=0.043) for EMT-Is. Moreover, regarding the self-evaluation of no-flow time, both self-satisfaction and self-abasement were associated with objectively poor teamwork performance.

Conclusions: EMTs' subjective and objective performance was inconsistent during the MCPR simulation. Self-confidence and knowledge were personal factors associated with MCPR deployment and teamwork performance. Both self-satisfaction and self-abasement were detrimental to teamwork during resuscitation.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; education & training (see medical education & training); medical education & training.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Emergency Medical Services*
  • Emergency Medical Technicians* / education
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Self-Assessment
  • Young Adult