Performance Development of European Swimmers Across the Olympic Cycle

Dennis-Peter Born; Michel Schönfelder; Oliver Logan; Bjørn Harald Olstad; Michael Romann

doi:10.3389/fspor.2022.894066

Performance Development of European Swimmers Across the Olympic Cycle

Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jun 10:4:894066. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.894066. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Dennis-Peter Born^{1

2}, Michel Schönfelder², Oliver Logan³, Bjørn Harald Olstad⁴, Michael Romann²

Affiliations

¹ Swiss Swimming Federation, Section for High-Performance Sports, Bern, Switzerland.
² Department for Elite Sport, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen, Magglingen, Switzerland.
³ British Swimming Federation, Sportpark, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
⁴ Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

The aims of the study were to (1) quantify the performance development of race times and key performance indicators of European swimmers across the last Olympic cycle (from 2016 to 2021) and (2) provide reference values for long-course swimming pool events for both sexes from 50 m to 1,500 m including butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, freestyle, and individual medley. Individual events from the 2016 and 2021 European swimming championships were included. Specifically, 246 men (age: 24.2 ± 3.4 years, FINA points: 890 ± 40) and 256 women races (age: 24.2 ± 4, FINA points: 879 ± 38) of the finalists were recorded and key performance indicators and split times analyzed. Performance differences in finalists of the 2016 and 2021 European championships were determined by an independent t-test and Cohen's d effect size. Reference values were retrieved from 2021 European championship finalists and are provided for all key performance indicators. Race times improved significantly (P < 0.05) or showed moderate (d = 0.5-1) to large effect sizes (d > 1) in 14 (men) and 6 (women) out of 16 events. Improvements were primarily evident in 100 m and 200 m events for males, as well as BR and sprint events for female swimmers. While start times improved in 15 (men) and 14 (women) events, turn times remained inconclusive in both sexes. Generally, breakout distances increased. Clean swimming velocities were faster in 12 (men) and 5 (women) events. In particular, for alternating swimming strokes, i.e., backstroke and freestyle, effect sizes indicated improved swimming efficiency with an inverse relationship between reduced stroke rate and increased distance per stroke. Coaches and performance analysts may use the present reference values as comparative data for race analyses and to specifically prepare swimmers for the various race sections. Data on the performance development should be used to analyze swimmers' potential and set goals for the various events and the next Olympic cycle.

Keywords: athletes; competition; development; reference values; sports.