Where stress presides: predictors and correlates of stress among Australian judges and magistrates

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 May 24;29(2):290-322. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1904456. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Recent research on the nature, prevalence and severity of judicial stress in Australia has revealed a considerable burden of stress placed upon the judicial system. This article builds upon this research by exploring the demographic and workplace factors associated with elevated stress among Australian judicial officers. A survey of 152 judicial officers from 5 Australian courts found that judicial stress - operationalised as non-specific psychological distress, depressive and anxious symptoms, burnout and secondary traumatic stress - was predicted by satisfaction of the basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence and relatedness. The only demographic variable found to be reliably associated with judicial stress was jurisdiction: compared with judicial officers in the higher jurisdictions (i.e. judges), those in the summary jurisdictions (i.e. magistrates) reported significantly higher levels of stress and significantly lower levels of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Implications and areas for future research are discussed. Alcohol use and dependence was not associated with levels of stress or needs satisfaction.

Keywords: autonomy; basic psychological needs theory; burnout; judicial stress; judicial wellbeing; judicial work; occupational stress; relatedness; secondary traumatic stress; vicarious trauma.