Comparison of Changes in Vital Signs During Ground and Helicopter Emergency Medical Services and Hospital Interventions

Air Med J. 2022 Jul-Aug;41(4):391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have evaluated the effects of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) alone. This single-center study compared the changes in vital signs during ground emergency medical services (GEMS), HEMS, and hospital interventions to assess the impact of HEMS interventions.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 168 trauma patients older than 18 years of age who received HEMS. Patients with cardiac arrest or those who received medical attention before HEMS were excluded. We assessed 3 intervention phases (GEMS, HEMS, and hospital). The changes in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and shock index in response to interventions were calculated and divided by the intervention time, and the changes observed during the interventions were compared.

Results: No changes in vital signs were observed when receiving GEMS. Systolic blood pressure increased and shock index decreased after HEMS, whereas systolic blood pressure decreased and shock index increased during hospital interventions. Heart rate showed no significant change (P = .12), and respiratory rate showed very little change. Systolic blood pressure increased significantly during HEMS compared with the pre- and postintervention periods.

Conclusion: Changes in vital signs differed according to the intervention. Systolic blood pressure increased during HEMS but not with GEMS or hospital interventions.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Air Ambulances*
  • Aircraft
  • Emergency Medical Services*
  • Heart Rate
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Retrospective Studies