Lung-Optimized Deep-Learning-Based Reconstruction for Ultralow-Dose CT

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To evaluate the image properties of lung-specialized deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) and its applicability in ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) relative to hybrid- (HIR) and model-based iterative-reconstructions (MBIR).

Materials and methods: An anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 320-row scanner at 50-mA (low-dose-CT 1 [LDCT-1]), 25-mA (LDCT-2), and 10-mA (ULDCT). LDCT were reconstructed with HIR; ULDCT images were reconstructed with HIR (ULDCT-HIR), MBIR (ULDCT-MBIR), and DLR (ULDCT-DLR). Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified. With the LDCT images as reference standards, ULDCT image qualities were subjectively scored on a 5-point scale (1 = substantially inferior to LDCT-2, 3 = comparable to LDCT-2, 5 = comparable to LDCT-1). For task-based image quality analyses, a physical evaluation phantom was scanned at seven doses to achieve the noise levels equivalent to chest phantom; noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated. Clinical ULDCT (10-mA) images obtained in 14 nonobese patients were reconstructed with HIR, MBIR, and DLR; the subjective acceptability was ranked.

Results: Image noise was lower and CNR was higher in ULDCT-DLR and ULDCT-MBIR than in LDCT-1, LDCT-2, and ULDCT-HIR (p < 0.01). The overall quality of ULDCT-DLR was higher than of ULDCT-HIR and ULDCT-MBIR (p < 0.01), and almost comparable with that of LDCT-2 (mean score: 3.4 ± 0.5). DLR yielded the highest NPS peak frequency and TTF_50% for high-contrast object. In clinical ULDCT images, the subjective acceptability of DLR was higher than of HIR and MBIR (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: DLR optimized for lung CT improves image quality and provides possible greater dose optimization opportunity than HIR and MBIR.

Keywords: CT; Deep-learning; Image reconstruction; Lung; Ultralow-dose.