Prognostic value of post-treatment fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity in ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy

Eur Radiol. 2022 Dec;32(12):8067-8076. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08886-1. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the value of post-treatment fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) in predicting clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed data from consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation between July 2017 and February 2021. Together with other variables, status of post-treatment FVH was assessed for each patient. Good outcome was defined as a 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent-samples t test, multivariate logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used as appropriate.

Results: Among 84 included patients, 48 (57.1%) patients showed post-treatment FVH. Post-treatment FVH significantly correlated with incomplete recanalization (p < 0.05) and low Alberta Stroke Project Early CT Changes Score on post-treatment diffusion-weighted imaging (p < 0.05). Higher incidence of hemorrhage transformation was observed in patients with post-treatment FVH than those without (27.1% vs. 16.7%); however, the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.259). Successful recanalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.024; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.003-0.194; p < 0.05), lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at admission (NIHSSpre) (OR, 1.196; 95% CI, 1.017-1.406; p < 0.05), and no post-treatment FVH (OR, 74.690; 95% CI, 4.624-1206.421; p < 0.05) were found to be independent predictors of good outcomes. Combined models integrating all three independent predictors (recanalization+NIHSSpre+post-treatment FVH) significantly outperformed the combined model without post-treatment FVH (recanalization+NIHSSpre) in predicting clinical outcome (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: Post-treatment FVH may be an effective prognostic marker associated with clinical outcome in patients with AIS after EVT.

Key points: • Post-treatment FVH correlates with incomplete recanalization and higher infarct volume. • Post-treatment FVH is independently associated with an unfavorable outcome. • Post-treatment FVH may provide prognostic information in patients with AIS after EVT.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Prognosis; Stroke; Thrombectomy.

MeSH terms

  • Brain Ischemia* / diagnostic imaging
  • Brain Ischemia* / surgery
  • Endovascular Procedures*
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Stroke* / diagnostic imaging
  • Ischemic Stroke* / surgery
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke* / epidemiology
  • Thrombectomy / methods
  • Treatment Outcome