The Modern Double-Poling Technique Is Not More Energy Efficient Than the Old-Fashioned Double-Poling Technique at a Submaximal Work Intensity

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether there are energy-efficiency differences between the execution of the old-fashioned double-poling technique (DP_OLD) and the modern double-poling technique (DP_MOD) at a submaximal work intensity among elite male cross-country skiers. Fifteen elite male cross-country skiers completed two 4-min tests at a constant mechanical work rate (MWR) using the DP_MOD and DP_OLD. During the last minute of each test, the mean oxygen uptake (VO₂) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were analyzed, from which the metabolic rate (MR) and gross efficiency (GE) were calculated. In addition, the difference between pretest and posttest blood-lactate concentrations (BLa_diff) was determined. For each technique, skiers' joint angles (i.e., heel, ankle, knee, hip, shoulder, and elbow) were analyzed at the highest and lowest positions during the double-poling cycle. Paired-samples t-tests were used to investigate differences between DP_MOD and DP_OLD outcomes. There were no significant differences in either VO₂mean, MR, GE, or BLa_diff (all P > 0.05) between the DP_MOD and DP_OLD tests. DP_MOD execution was associated with a higher RER (P < 0.05). Significant technique-specific differences were found in either the highest and/or the lowest position for all six analyzed joint angles (all P < 0.001). Hence, despite decades of double-poling technique development, which is reflected in the significant biomechanical differences between DP_OLD and DP_MOD execution, at submaximal work intensity, the modern technique is not more energy efficient than the old-fashioned technique.

Keywords: biomechanical analysis; blood lactate concentration; cross-country skiing; double poling; gross efficiency; kinematics; oxygen uptake.