Anaerobic Contribution Determined in Free-Swimming: Sensitivity to Maturation Stages and Validity

Eduardo Zapaterra Campos; Carlos Augusto Kalva-Filho; Maria Souza Silva; Tarine Botta Arruda; Ronaldo Bucken Gobbi; Fúlvia Barros Manchado-Gobatto; Marcelo Papoti

doi:10.3389/fspor.2022.760296

Anaerobic Contribution Determined in Free-Swimming: Sensitivity to Maturation Stages and Validity

Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 17:4:760296. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.760296. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Eduardo Zapaterra Campos¹, Carlos Augusto Kalva-Filho², Maria Souza Silva², Tarine Botta Arruda², Ronaldo Bucken Gobbi², Fúlvia Barros Manchado-Gobatto³, Marcelo Papoti²

Affiliations

¹ Graduate Program in Physical Education, Sports Performance Research Nucleus (NIDE), Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
² Study Group in Physiological Sciences and Exercise (GECIFEX), School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, EEFERP-USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
³ Laboratory of Applied Sport Physiology, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

Evaluation of anaerobic contribution is important under swimming settings (training and modification through ages), therefore, it is expected to change during maturation. The accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method can be used to determine the contribution of nonoxidative energy during swimming; however, it requires several days of evaluation. An alternative method to estimate anaerobic contribution evaluation (AC_ALT), which can also be evaluated without snorkel (i.e., free-swimming, AC_FS), has been proposed; however, these methods have never been compared. Thus, this study (i) analyzed the effect of maturation stage on AC_FS during maximal 400 m swimming (Part I), and (ii) compared AOD with AC_ALT and AC_FS, determined in a maximal 400 m effort (Part II). In Part I, 34 swimmers were divided into three groups, according to maturation stages (early-pubertal, middle-pubertal, and pubertal), and subjected to a maximal 400 m free-swimming to determine AC_FS. In Part II, six swimmers were subjected to one 400 m maximal effort, and four submaximal constant efforts. The AOD was determined by the difference between the estimated demand and accumulated oxygen during the entire effort. The AC_ALT and AC_FS (for Part I as well) was assumed as the sum of lactic and alactic anaerobic contributions. AC_FS was higher in pubertal (3.8 ± 1.1 L) than early (2.1 ± 0.9 L) and middle pubertal group (2.4 ± 1.1 L). No difference was observed among absolute AOD (3.2 ± 1.3 L), AC_ALT (3.2 ± 1.5 L), and AC_FS (4.0 ± 0.9 L) (F = 3.6; p = 0.06). Relative AOD (51.8 ± 12.2 mL·kg^-1), AC_ALT (50.5 ± 14.3 mL·kg^-1), and AC_FS (65.2 ± 8.8 mL·kg^-1) presented main effect (F = 4.49; p = 0.04), without posthoc difference. The bias of AOD vs. AC_ALT was 0.04 L, and AOD vs. AC_FS was -0.74 L. The limits of agreement between AOD and AC_ALT were +0.9 L and -0.8 L, and between AOD and AC_FS were +0.7 L and -2.7 L. It can be concluded that AC_FS determination is a feasible tool to determine anaerobic contribution in young swimmers, and it changes during maturation stages. Also, AC_FS might be useful to measure anaerobic contribution in swimmers, especially because it allows greater speeds.

Keywords: accumulated oxygen deficit; anaerobic contribution; maturation; swimming; young swimmers.