Single-stage buried autologous breast reconstruction (BABR)

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstructive standards are increasingly high oncologically, aesthetically, and practically. Autologous breast reconstruction remains the gold standard which, buried, after nipple-sparing mastectomy (where oncologically safe) or wise pattern reduction for large or ptotic patients, with contralateral symmetrisation where required, enables single-stage reconstruction. However, previous series report prohibitively high revision rates. This series prospectively compares a series of buried and non-buried free flaps for breast reconstruction.

Methods: All breast reconstructions with free autologous tissue transfer, buried or with a cutaneous paddle, conducted over 8 years by a single surgeon were included. Demographic, oncologic and reconstructive details, immediate complications and revision surgeries were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 182 free flaps were performed on 156 patients, 69 buried and 113 with cutaneous paddles. There were no significant demographic or complication differences between the two groups. Of the buried group, 51% did not require further surgery compared to 29% of the paddle group.

Conclusions: Buried autologous breast reconstruction is a safe and aesthetic option for breast reconstruction, and potentially single stage. This is particularly true where it is combined with nipple-sparing mastectomy (where oncologically safe) or breast reduction mastectomy, and contralateral symmetrisation, where required. Further research could include patient reported outcome measures and cost analysis.

Keywords: breast reconstruction, microsurgical free flap, breast neoplasms; methods*, mastectomy; methods*, nipples; surgery*, female, free tissue flaps, humans, mammaplasty; surgery*, nipples*.