Background: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a common treatment for patients with urinary and faecal incontinence. A close contact of the tined lead electrode with the targeted nerve is likely to improve functional outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the SNM lead in relation to the sacral nerve by comparing different implantation techniques.
Methods: This cadaver study was conducted at the Division of Anatomy of Vienna's Medical University in October 2020. We dissected 10 cadavers after bilateral SNM lead implantation (n = 20), using two different standardized implantation techniques. The cadavers were categorized as group A (n = 10), representing the conventional guided implantation group and group B (n = 10), where SNM implantation was conducted with the novel fluoroscopy-guided "H"-technique. The primary goal was to assess the distance between the sacral nerve and the lead placement.
Results: The electrodes were inserted at a median angle of 58.5° (46-65°) in group A and 60° (50-65°) in group B, without reaching statistical significance. In 8 cadavers, the lead entered the S3 foramen successfully. The median distance of the lead to the nerve did not show a significant difference between both groups (E0: Group A: 0.0 mm vs. Group B: 0.0 mm, p = 0.969; E1: Group A: 0.0 mm vs. Group B: 0.5 mm p = 0.754; E2: Group A: 2.5 mm vs. Group B: 2.5 mm p = 1.000; E3: Group A: 3.5 mm vs. Group B: 4.0 mm p = 0.675). In 2 cases (20%) of the conventional group A, the lead was misplaced and located at the gluteal muscle. Perforation of the presacral fascia was observed in one lead placement in group A and in two placements in group B.
Conclusions: Both standardized implantation techniques may ensure close electrode proximity to the targeted nerve. Misplacement of the electrode was more often observed with the conventional implantation technique.
Keywords: Anal incontinence; Faecal incontinence; Implantation techniques; Sacral neuromodulation; Sacral neurostimulation.
© 2022. The Author(s).