Determining the Characteristics of Farms That Raise Pigs without Antibiotics

Elise Bernaerdt; Dominiek Maes; Tommy Van Limbergen; Merel Postma; Jeroen Dewulf

doi:10.3390/ani12101224

Determining the Characteristics of Farms That Raise Pigs without Antibiotics

Animals (Basel). 2022 May 10;12(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ani12101224.

Authors

Elise Bernaerdt¹, Dominiek Maes¹, Tommy Van Limbergen², Merel Postma³, Jeroen Dewulf³

Affiliations

¹ Unit of Porcine Health Management, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
² ANITOM bv, Pierstraat 122, 2630 Aartselaar, Belgium.
³ Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

Abstract

Reduced and responsible antimicrobial use leads to a lower risk of developing antimicrobial resistance. Raised Without Antibiotics (RWA) is a certification label that is recognized in only a few countries, and it is often unclear what the specific criteria and characteristics of RWA farms are. The objectives of this study were to describe the criteria for a Belgian RWA program; to coach farms towards reduced antimicrobial usage (AMU); to assess if it was possible to obtain and maintain the RWA status; and to determine differences between RWA and conventional pig farms. Pig farms (n = 28) were visited three times for the following reasons: (1) data collection, (2) farm-specific coaching (2 months later), and (3) evaluation (7 months later). AMU was followed from before the start of the study up to one year after the last visit. AMU, biosecurity (Biocheck.UGent^TM), and farm characteristics of (non-)RWA farms were compared. RWA was defined as no antibiotics from birth until slaughter. Pigs requiring individual treatment received a special ear tag and were excluded from the program. The status of the farms varied over time, and the distribution of RWA vs. non-RWA was 10-18, 13-15, and 12-16, before intervention, after coaching, and after one year, respectively. For the non-RWA farms, there was a reduction in AMU of 61%, 38%, and 23%, for the suckling piglets, fattening pigs, and sows, respectively, indicating that they were moving toward the RWA status. There were no significant differences in biosecurity status between RWA and non-RWA farms, but biosecurity improved in all farms throughout the study. RWA farms were smaller (median 200 sows) compared to non-RWA farms (median 350 sows). The 4-week system was used more in non-RWA farms, while the 3- and 5-week systems were used most often in RWA farms. This study showed that farmers could achieve and maintain the RWA status through farm-specific coaching related to prudent AMU and improved biosecurity.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial usage; biosecurity; herd management; pig production; raised without antibiotics.

Grants and funding

This research was funded by Belgian Pork Group.