Analysis of the Clinical Significance and Safety of Interferon in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloproliferative Tumors

Fenglei Yin; Juan Yin; Weixing Xu; Shuchen Li; Wei Zhang; Juan Wang

doi:10.1155/2022/6551868

Analysis of the Clinical Significance and Safety of Interferon in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloproliferative Tumors

J Oncol. 2022 May 16:2022:6551868. doi: 10.1155/2022/6551868. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Fenglei Yin¹, Juan Yin², Weixing Xu¹, Shuchen Li¹, Wei Zhang¹, Juan Wang¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Hematology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
² Anesthesiology Deptartment and Operation Room, Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical significance and safety of interferon in the treatment of chronic myeloproliferative tumors (MPN).

Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 120 patients with advanced chronic MPN admitted to our hospital between April 2016 and August 2020 were assessed for eligibility and recruited, including 62 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET (ET group) and 58 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV (PV group). 62 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET were assigned (1 : 1) to receive interferon-α (IFN-α) or hydroxyurea (HU). A similar subgrouping method for treatment of IFN-α and HU was introduced to patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV. Outcome measures included efficacy and adverse reactions.

Results: For patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET and PV, there were no significant differences in the overall response rate between the groups treated with IFN-α or HU (P > 0.05); however, the patients treated with IFN-α had a significantly higher 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with HU (P < 0.05). IFN-α was associated with a significantly lower incidence of disease progression, thrombotic events, splenomegaly, myelofibrosis, nausea, and vomiting and a higher incidence of hematological adverse reactions and flu-like symptoms versus HU (P < 0.05). After six months of treatment, the PV group had 12 cases of hematological response both in the IFN-α subgroup and the HU subgroup and fewer PV patients treated with IFN-α required phlebotomy versus those treated with HU (P < 0.05), in which 4 patients in the IFN-α subgroup had no hematological response and 6 patients in the HU subgroup had no hematological response. There was no significant difference in the number of cases with phlebotomy between the two subgroups of PV patients without hematological response (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of IFN in the treatment of JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET and PV patients yields a prominent clinical effect by prolonging PFS and avoiding phlebotomy for JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV patients.