A watershed study assessing effects of commercial hog operations on microbial water quality in North Carolina, USA

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 2):156085. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156085. Epub 2022 May 20.

Abstract

Commercial Hog Operations (CHOs) produce large amounts of fecal waste, which is often treated in lagoons and sprayed onto fields as fertilizer. The effects of these systems on proximal water quality compared to ambient conditions have not been well-studied, and are particularly important for understanding the dissemination of fecal bacteria and antimicrobial resistance. A longitudinal, case-control watershed study was designed to study effects of CHOs on microbial water quality among watersheds with similar soil, land use, human population, and area. We compared watersheds with (n = 13) and without (n = 9) CHOs over one year measuring fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), microbial source tracking (MST) fecal markers, and antimicrobial resistance in isolated Escherichia coli. E. coli concentrations were higher (p < 0.001) at sites downstream of CHOs (1284 CFU/100 mL, n = 103) compared to background sites (687 CFU/100 mL, n = 74). The human MST marker HF183 was detected at similarly low concentrations (PR = 1.3 (0.91, 1.8), p = 0.30). However, the swine MST marker pig-2-bac was found at more sites downstream of CHOs (PR = 3.5 (0.98, 12), p = 0.035) and at a significantly higher (p = 0.003) mean concentration at sites downstream of CHOs (283 copies/mL) compared to background sites (0.76 copies/mL). The presence of any antimicrobial resistance was observed more often for E. coli isolated downstream from CHOs (19%, n = 556) than background sites (6%, n = 356), with tetracycline resistance observed most often. Nine isolates from four sites downstream of CHOs and one isolate from a background site were confirmed β-lactamase-producing E. coli. Overall, these results show that fecal microbes and antimicrobial resistance from CHOs may be transported off-site, however more research is needed to characterize timing and conditions of off-site transport. Mitigation strategies such as optimizeation of waste treatment, buffers, and antibiotic stewardship could help reduce the contributions of microbial contaminants to surface water.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Commercial hog operations; Fecal indicator bacteria; Microbial source tracking; Surface water; Watershed.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Infective Agents*
  • Bacteria
  • Environmental Monitoring / methods
  • Escherichia coli
  • Feces / microbiology
  • North Carolina
  • Swine
  • Water Microbiology
  • Water Pollution
  • Water Quality*

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents