Factors Related to Engagement in Employment After Spinal Cord Injury in Australia: A Cross-sectional Study

Samantha J Borg; David N Borg; Mohit Arora; James W Middleton; Ruth Marshall; Andrew Nunn; Timothy Geraghty

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.011

Factors Related to Engagement in Employment After Spinal Cord Injury in Australia: A Cross-sectional Study

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec;103(12):2345-2354. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 16.

Authors

Samantha J Borg¹, David N Borg², Mohit Arora³, James W Middleton³, Ruth Marshall⁴, Andrew Nunn⁵, Timothy Geraghty⁶

Affiliations

¹ From the The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane. Electronic address: s.borg@griffith.edu.au.
² From the The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane.
³ John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Sydney Medical School-Northern, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney.
⁴ South Australian Spinal Cord Injury Service, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
⁵ Victorian Spinal Cord Service, Austin Health, Heidelberg.
⁶ From the The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane; Division of Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

PMID: 35584739
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.011

Abstract

Objective: To explore the association between sociodemographic, health, functional independence, and environmental variables with engagement in paid work for people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: Self-reported, cross-sectional Australian data from a large international SCI survey.

Setting: Community-based.

Participants: 1189 working-age people with SCI (18-67 years) or aged >67 years and engaged in paid employment. Respondents were community based and at least 1 year after injury.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Employment and work integration variables. Bayesian penalized regression was used to determine associations between 23 predictor variables and engagement in paid work.

Results: Most participants (87%) were employed pre-injury, with 39% in paid employment at the time of the survey. Participants who attained a master's/doctoral degree (odds ratio [OR]=3.01; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.63, 5.44) and those married (OR=1.68; 95% CrI, 1.13, 2.49) were more likely to be engaged in paid work. Women (OR=0.55; 95% CrI, 0.37, 0.81), people receiving a disability pension (OR=0.17; 95% CrI, 0.13, 0.24), and older participants (OR=0.75; 95% CrI, 0.63, 0.90) were less likely to be in paid work. Working participants identified hardships including problems completing their work (60%) and accessing the workplace (32%), as well as unmet needs relating to assistive devices required for completing their work (50%).

Conclusions: Findings from the current study can assist in directing resources to subgroups within the SCI population who need greater assistance or intervention related to employment outcomes, including through vocational rehabilitation services/programs. Unmet needs and workplace issues expressed by employed individuals identify gaps in work integration and satisfaction that could affect employment sustainability that need to be addressed.

Keywords: Employment; Rehabilitation; Return to work; Vocational rehabilitation; Work integration.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Australia
Bayes Theorem
Cross-Sectional Studies
Employment
Female
Humans
Spinal Cord Injuries* / rehabilitation