Developing predictive hybridization models for phosphorothioate oligonucleotides using high-resolution melting

PLoS One. 2022 May 18;17(5):e0268575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268575. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The ability to predict nucleic acid hybridization energies has been greatly enabling for many applications, but predictive models require painstaking experimentation, which may limit expansion to non-natural nucleic acid analogues and chemistries. We have assessed the utility of dye-based, high-resolution melting (HRM) as an alternative to UV-Vis determinations of hyperchromicity in order to more quickly acquire parameters for duplex stability prediction. The HRM-derived model for phosphodiester (PO) DNA can make comparable predictions to previously established models. Using HRM, it proved possible to develop predictive models for DNA duplexes containing phosphorothioate (PS) linkages, and we found that hybridization stability could be predicted as a function of sequence and backbone composition for a variety of duplexes, including PS:PS, PS:PO, and partially modified backbones. Individual phosphorothioate modifications destabilize helices by around 0.12 kcal/mol on average. Finally, we applied these models to the design of a catalytic hairpin assembly circuit, an enzyme-free amplification method used for nucleic acid-based molecular detection. Changes in PS circuit behavior were consistent with model predictions, further supporting the addition of HRM modeling and parameters for PS oligonucleotides to the rational design of nucleic acid hybridization.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • DNA* / genetics
  • Nucleic Acid Conformation
  • Nucleic Acid Hybridization
  • Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides*

Substances

  • Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides
  • DNA

Grants and funding

S.S.W. received funding support from the John Templeton Foundation (54466). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. www.templeton.org S.S.W. received funding support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1610403). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. www.nsfgrfp.org S.S.W. and S.B. received funding support from the Welch Foundation (F-1654). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. welch1.org E.X. received funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21904042). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. www.nsfc.gov.cn E.X. received funding support from the China Scholarship Council (No. 201606130011). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. www.chinesescholarshipcouncil.com.