Background: During the last 20 years of conflict in the Middle East, improvements in body armor and the use of improvised explosive devices have resulted in an increased incidence of complex craniofacial trauma (CFT). Currently, CFT comprises up to 40% of all casualties. We present new data from the recent conflict in Iraq and Syria during Operation Inherent Resolve.
Methods: Data were collected for patients treated at role 1, role 2, and role 3 facilities in Iraq and Syria over a 1-year period. During this time, a specialized head & neck surgical augmentation team was deployed and colocated with the central role 3 facility. Data included for this cross-sectional study are as follows: injury type and mechanism, triage category, initial managing facility and subsequent levels of care, and procedures performed.
Results: Ninety-six patients sustained CFT over the study period. The most common injuries were soft tissue (57%), followed by cranial (44%) and orbital/facial (31%). Associated truncal and/or extremity injuries were seen in 46 patients (48%). There were marked differences in incidence and pattern of injuries between mechanisms (all p < 0.05). While improvised explosive devices had the highest rate of cranial and truncal injuries, gunshot wounds and blunt mechanisms had higher incidences of orbital/facial and neck injuries. Overall, 45% required operative interventions including complex facial reconstruction, craniotomy, and open globe repair. Mortality was 6% with 83% due to associated severe brain injury. Most patients were local nationals (70%) who required discharge or transfer to the local health care system.
Conclusion: Complex craniofacial trauma is increasingly seen by deployed surgeons, regardless of subspecialty training or location. Deployment of a centrally located head and neck team greatly enhances the capabilities for forward deployed management of CFT, with excellent outcomes for both US and local national patients.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/care management; Level V.
Copyright © 2022 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.