Pathology and surgical outcomes of unstable painful shoulders

Shota Hoshika; Keisuke Matsuki; Morihito Tokai; Takeshi Morioka; Yusuke Ueda; Hiroshige Hamada; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya

doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.004

Pathology and surgical outcomes of unstable painful shoulders

JSES Int. 2022 Feb 5;6(3):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.004. eCollection 2022 May.

Authors

Shota Hoshika¹, Keisuke Matsuki¹, Morihito Tokai², Takeshi Morioka¹, Yusuke Ueda¹, Hiroshige Hamada¹, Norimasa Takahashi¹, Hiroyuki Sugaya²

Affiliations

¹ Sports Medicine and Joint Center, Funabashi Orthopaedic Hospital, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan.
² Tokyo Sports and Orthopaedic Clinic, Toshima, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

Background: Boileau et al have reported on the unstable, painful shoulder (UPS), which was defined as painful shoulders without any recognized anteroinferior subluxations or dislocations that were associated with roll-over lesions (ie, instability lesions) on imaging or at arthroscopy. However, they included various pathologies, probably due to the ambiguity in their definitions of UPS. We redefined UPS as follows: (1) shoulder pain during daily or sports activities, (2) traumatic onset, (3) no complaint of shoulder instability, and (4) soft-tissue or bony lesions, such as Bankart or humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligament lesion, confirmed by arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate pathologies of UPS based on our definitions. We also aimed to assess the outcomes after arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization for UPS.

Methods: We reviewed patients who were retrospectively diagnosed as UPS based on our definition and underwent arthroscopic stabilization between January 2007 and September 2018. Patients' demographics, physical and radiographic findings, intraoperative findings, clinical outcomes (Rowe scores, Subjective Shoulder Value [SSV], and the visual analog scale [VAS] for pain), and return to play sport (RTPS) were investigated.

Results: This study included 91 shoulders in 91 patients with a mean age of 23 years (range, 15-51). The mean follow-up was 37 months (range, 24-156). Eighty-seven patients were involved in sports activities: collision/contact, 55 patients (60%); overhead, 26 patients (29%). The pain was reproduced during the anterior apprehension test in 86 shoulders (95%). Normal type (49%) predominated in glenoid morphology followed by fragment (bony Bankart) type (37%). Most fragment-type lesions were seen in collision/contact athletes. Intraoperative findings demonstrated that Bankart lesions were found in all patients and Hill-Sachs lesions only in 42%. Magnetic resonance arthrography in the abducted and externally rotated positions showed a Bankart lesion in 76 shoulders (84%). Rowe score, SSV, and pain VAS significantly improved postoperatively (P < .001 for each). Forty-two of 70 athletes (60 %) with > 2-year follow-up returned to the sport at a complete or near-preinjury level. Six (9%) athletes experienced reinjury.

Conclusion: All shoulders that were diagnosed as UPS with our definition had a Bankart lesion. There seemed to be two different types of pathologies: Bankart lesions in lax shoulders and bony Bankart lesions in collision/contact athletes. The pain experienced during the anterior apprehension test may be useful for the diagnosis of UPS. Arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization yielded good clinical outcomes with a high RTPS rate, but the reinjury rate was relatively high.

Keywords: Bankart lesion; Collision and contact athlete; Magnetic resonance arthrography; Surgical outcomes; Three-dimensionally reconstructed CT; Unstable painful shoulder.