Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques

Jana Steger; Alissa Jell; Stefanie Ficht; Daniel Ostler; Markus Eblenkamp; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm

doi:10.2147/TCRM.S335102

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 May 4:18:523-539. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S335102. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Jana Steger¹, Alissa Jell^{1

2}, Stefanie Ficht³, Daniel Ostler¹, Markus Eblenkamp³, Petra Mela³, Dirk Wilhelm^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Chair of Research Group Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention (MITI), Munich, Germany.
² Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Clinic and Polyclinic for Surgery, Munich, Germany.
³ Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Chair of Medical Materials and Implants, Garching, Germany.

Abstract

Purpose: Anastomosis creation after resective gastrointestinal surgery is a crucial task. The present review examines the techniques and implants currently available for anastomosis creation and analyses to which extent they already address our clinical needs, with a special focus on their potential to enable further trauma minimization in visceral surgery.

Methods: A multi-database research was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Comparative controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials dealing with anastomosis creation techniques in the intestinal tract in both German and English were included and statistically significant differences in postoperative complication incidences were assessed using the RevMan5.4 Review Manager (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK).

Results: All methods and implant types were analyzed and compared with respect to four dimensions, assessing the techniques' current performances and further potentials for surgical trauma reduction. Postoperative outcome measures, such as leakage, stenosis, reoperation and mortality rates, as well as the tendency to cause bleeding, wound infections, abscesses, anastomotic hemorrhages, pulmonary embolisms, and fistulas were assessed, revealing the only statistically significant superiority of hand-suture over stapling anastomoses with respect to the occurrence of obstructions.

Conclusion: Based on the overall complication rates, it is concluded that none of the anastomosis systems addresses the demands of operative trauma minimization sufficiently yet. Major problems are furthermore either low standardization potentials due to dependence on the surgeons' levels of experience, high force application requirements for the actual anastomosis creation, or large and rigid device designs interfering with flexibility demands and size restrictions of the body's natural access routes. There is still a need for innovative technologies, especially with regard to enabling incisionless interventions.

Keywords: anastomotic technique; ideal anastomosis; intraoperative trauma; postoperative complications.

Publication types

Review

Grants and funding

Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – DFG-Project number: 386233407.