'Low-value' clinical care in general practice: associations of low value care in GP trainees' practice, including formative and summative examination performance - protocol for cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study analyses using the QUestionable In Training Clinical Activities (QUIT-CA) index

BMJ Open. 2022 May 11;12(5):e058989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058989.

Abstract

Introduction: 'Low value' clinical care and overuse of medical services are 'questionable' clinical activities that entail provision of medical services that are more likely to cause harm than good or whose benefit is disproportionately low compared with its cost. This study will seek to establish clinical practice associations of a non-observed work-based assessment of general practitioner (GP) trainees' (registrars') questionable practice (the QUestionable In Training Clinical Activities (QUIT-CA) index). We will also explore association of the QUIT-CA index with a formative observed work-based assessment, and will establish if registrars' QUIT-CA indexes are associated with summative examination performance.

Methods and analysis: We will conduct three analyses, all using data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. ReCEnT is an ongoing (from 2010) cohort study in which Australian GP registrars record details of their in-consultation clinical and educational practice. The QUIT-CA index is compiled from ReCEnT consultation data. A cross-sectional analysis, using negative binomial regression, will establish clinical practice associations of the QUIT-CA index. A cross-sectional analysis using linear regression will be used to establish associations of QUIT-CA index with formative observed in-practice assessment (the General Practice Registrar-Competency Assessment Grid). A retrospective cohort study analysis using linear regression will be used to establish associations of the QUIT-CA index with summative examination performance (Royal Australian College of General Practice fellowship examinations results).

Ethics and dissemination: The study has ethical approval from the University of Newcastle HREC(H-2009-0323). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journal articles and conference presentations.

Keywords: education & training (see medical education & training); medical education & training; primary care.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • General Practice* / education
  • General Practitioners* / education
  • Humans
  • Low-Value Care
  • Retrospective Studies