Environmental DNA detection of giant snakehead in Thailand's major rivers for wild stock assessment

PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0267667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267667. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Capture-based aquaculture is now gaining much attention in Southeast Asia. This system was used to produce several fish species with social and economic implications, including the giant snakehead (Channa micropeltes). As wild harvesting of organisms for seed stock is one of main practices in capture-based aquaculture, abundance and distribution of the wild stock are essential for both environmental impact evaluation and stock management. Mark and recapture, visual observation and physical capture of target species are costly, ineffective, and labour intensive for fish surveys in several cases. Detection of target organisms using eDNA (environmental DNA) could be a good alternative as it has proved to be a non-invasive, rapid, and sensitive method for aquatic species monitoring and surveying. Here, we developed a TaqMan assay that targets the 16S region of giant snakehead DNA to amplify eDNA captured in water samples. 300 µl of water samples were collected from 15 sites located in the Chao Phraya River Basin (Ping, Wang, Yom, Nan, and Chao Phraya River) and filtered with 0.7 µm glass fibre membrane filter. Giant snakehead eDNA was detected in most tributaries (60%) with concentrations ranging from 74.0 copies/ml in Wang River sites to 7.4 copies/ml in Nan River sites. As intensification of capture-based aquaculture could lead to depleting of wild fish stocks, urgent management is needed. However, the existing conventional approaches for assessment of fish overexploitation, survey and monitoring have several limitations.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • DNA, Environmental* / genetics
  • Environmental Monitoring / methods
  • Fishes / genetics
  • Rivers
  • Thailand
  • Water

Substances

  • DNA, Environmental
  • Water

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Chiang Mai University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.