Background: Although abdominal foci are the second most common source of sepsis, only few studies focus on the optimal length of post-operative antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients with abdominal sepsis. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of short versus long antibiotic therapy as well as broad-spectrum penicillin versus carbapenem in patients with abdominal sepsis. Patients and Methods: We performed a single center retrospective study in patients with abdominal sepsis who underwent emergency surgery. The study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Germany during 2016-2018. We reviewed the duration of post-operative antibiotic therapy and the initially used agent, comparing patients treated shorter or longer than seven days with or without source control. Depending on the empirically given antibiotic, a subgroup analysis was conducted comparing patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenems. Results: Longer duration of post-operative antibacterial treatment (>7 days) was not substantially advantageous. The group with a longer course of antibiotic therapy had more severe post-operative complications (82.4% [n = 61] vs. 62.5% [n = 20]; p = 0.01) requiring longer critical care support (18 days vs. 11 days; p = 0.027), prolonging the length of stay (28 days vs. 20 days; p = 0.044). Surgical re-interventions were more frequent in the long-course arm (70.3% vs. 40.6%; p = 0.004). The subgroup analysis comparing piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenems confirmed more severe complications (86.3% vs. 67.5%; p = 0.04) for the carbapenem arm. Conclusions: Post-surgical continuation of antibiotic agents beyond seven days was observed with more post-operative complications and delayed recovery. Piperacillin-tazobactam seems to be a potent alternative for patients with abdominal sepsis.
Keywords: abdominal sepsis; antimicrobial stewardship; empiric antibiotic therapy; intra-abdominal infections; source control.