Objectives: To compare image quality and radiation dose of computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head and neck in patients using two Gemstone Spectral Imaging (GSI) scanning protocols.
Methods: A total of 100 patients who underwent head-neck CTA were divided into two groups (A and B) according to the scanning protocols, with 50 patients in each group. The patients in group A underwent GSI scanning protocol 1 (GSI profile: head and neck CTA), while those in group B underwent GSI scanning protocol 2 (GSI profile: chest 80 mm). All images were reconstructed using 40% and 70% pre- and post-adaptive level statistical iterative reconstruction V (pre-ASiR-V and post-ASiR-V) algorithms, respectively. The CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length (DLP) product were recorded and the mean value was calculated and converted to the effective dose. CT values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of all images were calculated. Additionally, subjective image evaluation was conducted by two independent radiologists using a five-point scoring method. All data were statistically analyzed.
Results: There were no significant differences in the CT values, SNR, CNR, and subjective score between groups A and B (p > 0.05); however, the mean effective dose (1.2±0.1 mSv) in group B was 45.5% lower than that in group A (2.2±0.2 mSv) (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: GSI scanning protocol 2 could more effectively reduce the radiation dose in head-neck CT angiography while maintaining image quality compared to GSI scanning protocol 1.
Keywords: GSI scan protocol; head-neck CTA; image quality; radiation dose assessment.