Evaluating the efficacy of stool sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and its comparison with other sample types by meta-analysis for TB diagnostics

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;41(6):893-906. doi: 10.1007/s10096-022-04449-w. Epub 2022 May 4.

Abstract

Precise and timely detection of tuberculosis (TB) is crucial to reduce transmission. This study aims to assess the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on stool samples and systematically review the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with different sample types by meta-analysis. Stool samples of smear-negative pulmonary TB (PTB), cervical lymph node TB, and abdominal TB patients were tested on the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra system. Meta-analysis was performed on a set of 44 studies. Data were grouped by sample type, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra were calculated. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with stool samples was 100% for smear-negative PTB, 27.27% for cervical lymph node TB, and 50% for abdominal TB patients, with 100% specificity for all included TB groups. The summary estimate for all PTB samples showed 84.2% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity, and EPTB samples showed 88.6% sensitivity and 96.4% specificity. Among all sample types included in our meta-analysis, urine showed the best performance for EPTB diagnosis. This pilot study supports the use of stool as an alternative non-invasive sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for rapid testing, suitable for both PTB and EPTB diagnosis.

Keywords: Abdominal TB; Cervical lymph node TB; Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis; Meta-analysis; Pulmonary tuberculosis; Stool; Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Antibiotics, Antitubercular* / pharmacology
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Humans
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis* / genetics
  • Pilot Projects
  • Rifampin
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Sputum / microbiology
  • Tuberculosis* / diagnosis

Substances

  • Antibiotics, Antitubercular
  • Rifampin