Purpose: Real-life comparison of three intravitreal drug regimens used in cases of endophthalmitis at a tertiary care center in India.
Methods: In this prospective, comparative study, patients of bacterial endophthalmitis were grouped according to intravitreal antibiotic drug regimens into Group 1 (ceftazidime and vancomycin), Group 2 (piperacillin + tazobactam and vancomycin), and Group 3 (imipenem and vancomycin). Forty-eight hours after injection nonresponding/worsening patients underwent vitrectomy. Vitreous samples were subjected to microbiological and pharmacokinetic tests.
Results: A total of 64 patients were included and divided into Group 1: 29, Group 2: 20, and Group 3: 15 cases. Also, 75% of patients were post-surgical endophthalmitis, whereas 25% were post-traumatic. Improvement in vision (V90-0) and vision at 3 months (V90) were comparable between the three groups. Visual recovery was poorer in post-traumatic cases. In post-surgical cases, visual recovery was poorer in those presenting beyond 72 h of onset of symptoms (P = 0.0002). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity (66%) was higher than BACTECTM (33%) and culture (14%). Antibiotic resistance was comparable amongst the three groups. Most patients (62/64) further underwent vitrectomy. Ceftazidime and vancomycin achieved vitreous concentrations more than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at 48 h after the first injection.
Conclusion: The choice of antibiotics did not affect the rate of vitrectomy and final vision in a real-life scenario. Ceftazidime and vancomycin can still be used as first-line intravitreal antibiotics owing to their comparable microbial sensitivity profile and adequate ocular bioavailability.
Keywords: Ceftazidime; endophthalmitis; imipenem; piperacillin/tazobactam; vancomycin.