Most methods used to quantify event-related potential (ERP) data were developed for use with typical adult populations. Questions regarding how these methods apply to child ERP data remain. Here, we focused on two widely used ERP scoring methods, namely, time-window mean amplitude and peak amplitude measures, for two ERP error monitoring components, the error-related negativity (ERN) and the error positivity (Pe), collected from Kindergarteners during a child-friendly cognitive control task (N = 170). We first established the presence of error-related ERPs and examined the relations between ERP scores and children's behavioral task performance. We then assessed the data quality (precision) of mean and peak ERP amplitude scores at the level of individual participants using the standardized measurement error of ERPs. We also compared the effects of choosing baseline correction periods that were relatively distal versus proximal to responses on data quality. Across each of these analyses, we found that time-window mean amplitude scoring was comparable to, and in some cases outperformed, peak amplitude scoring. In addition, the proximal baseline provided higher data quality than the distal baseline. We conclude with specific recommendations regarding the scoring and baseline correction for ERP data collected from young children.
Keywords: ERP data quality; children ERPs; error positivity (Pe); error-related negativity (ERN); standardized measurement error (SME).
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.