Background: Present investigation aims to elucidate safety and efficacy of hemodialysis as well as peritoneal dialysis in treating end-stage diabetic nephropathy.
Methods: We searched various databases for articles from the database starting date to October 2019. The analysis involved studies that contained outcomes of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of end-stage diabetic nephropathy. A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 932 participants were collected.
Results: Meta-analysis results suggested that comparing with peritoneal dialysis group, hemodialysis group had a higher incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and bleeding complications. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the infection (P = 0.71) or malnutrition (P = 0.53) incidence between the two forms of dialysis. Hemodialysis could better improve the levels of albumin [mean difference (MD) = 6.80, 95% CI = (4.17-9.44)] and hemoglobin [MD = 3.40, 95% CI = (0.94-5.86)] than peritoneal dialysis after 3 months or more.
Conclusions: In treating end-stage diabetic nephropathy patients, peritoneal dialysis had a lower incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, as well as bleeding complication than hemodialysis. However, hemodialysis could better improve albumin and hemoglobin levels than peritoneal dialysis after 3 months.
Keywords: End-stage diabetic nephropathy; Hemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis; Randomized controlled trials.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.