Equivalence tests for ratio of means in bioequivalence studies under crossover design

Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):1405-1419. doi: 10.1177/09622802221093721. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

Abstract

There are several problems concerning the statistical definition of average bioequivalence provided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We proposed a ratio of means based on the original bioavailability measure as the definition for average bioequivalence. Under the log-normal distribution assumption, we proposed a hypothesis testing-based method and a confidence interval-based method to answer the question of whether the ratio of means falls into a predetermined interval. For the hypothesis testing-based method, we decomposed the null two-sided hypothesis of the ratio of means into two one-sided hypotheses. With the intersection-union theorem for asymptotic tests, we constructed two asymptotic size-α tests for the original null hypothesis. The method of variance estimation recovery was adopted to develop the confidence interval-based method. Simulation studies showed that the proposed methods can maintain the empirical type I error rate closely at the nominal level and is as powerful as the two one-sided t-test for testing the ratio of means under different settings. The application of the proposed methods was illustrated through six datasets in real-world examples.

Keywords: Equivalence test; bioequivalence; geometric mean ratio; ratio of means; two one-sided test.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Computer Simulation
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Research Design*
  • Therapeutic Equivalency*
  • United States