Effect of RNA quality to SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR detection from saliva

J Med Microbiol. 2022 Apr;71(4). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001507.

Abstract

Saliva is an alternative sample material to nasopharyngeal swab in SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. We investigated possible aspects to improve the reliability of SARS-CoV-2 detection from saliva. Saliva was collected from asymptomatic healthy subjects (n=133) and COVID-19 patients (n=9). SARS-CoV-2 detection was performed with quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) with two viral and one host target serving as an internal control. The use of internal control revealed that in the first RT-qPCR run 25-30 % of assays failed. The failure is associated with poor RNA quality. When the amount of RNA was cut down to half from the original amount, the performance of RT-qPCR was greatly enhanced (95 % of the assays succeeded). The quality of RNA was not affected by the use of different nucleic acid stabilizing buffers. Our study showed that saliva is suitable material for RT-qPCR based SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, but the use of internal control is essential to distinguish the true negative samples from failed assays.

Keywords: COVID-19; RT-qPCR; SARS-CoV-2; saliva.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Nasopharynx
  • RNA, Viral / analysis
  • RNA, Viral / genetics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • SARS-CoV-2* / genetics
  • Saliva
  • Specimen Handling

Substances

  • RNA, Viral