Purpose: To compare the decompressive effect around the optic nerve canal among 3 different decompression procedures (medial, balanced, and inferomedial) using 3D printed models.
Methods: In this experimental study, based on data obtained from 9 patients (18 sides) with dysthyroid optic neuropathy, a preoperative control model and 3 plaster decompression models were created using a 3D printer (total, 72 sides of 36 models). A pressure sensor was placed at the optic foramen, and the orbital space was filled with silicone. The surface of the silicone was pushed down directly, and changes in pressure were recorded at 2-mm increments of pushing.
Results: At 10 mm of pushing, there was significantly lower pressure in the medial (19,782.2 ± 4319.9 Pa, P = 0.001), balanced (19,448.3 ± 3767.4 Pa, P = 0.003), and inferomedial (15,855.8 ± 4000.7 Pa, P < 0.001) decompression models than in the control model (25,217.8 ± 6087.5 Pa). Overall, the statistical results for each 2-mm push were similar among the models up to 10 mm of pushing (P < 0.050). At each push, inferomedial decompression caused the greatest reduction in pressure (P < 0.050), whereas there was no significant difference in pressure between the medial and balanced decompression models (P > 0.050).
Conclusion: All 3 commonly performed decompression procedures significantly reduced retrobulbar pressure. Because inferomedial decompression models obtained the greatest reduction in pressure on the optic nerve canal, inferomedial decompression should be considered the most reliable procedure for rescuing vision in dysthyroid optic neuropathy.
Keywords: 3D printer; Balanced orbital decompression; Dysthyroid optic neuropathy; Inferomedial orbital wall decompression; Medial orbital wall decompression.
© 2022. The Author(s).