Aim: Remote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardiac devices has enabled continuous surveillance of atrial high rate episodes (AHREs) with well-recognized clinical benefits. We aimed to add evidence on the role of the RM as compared to conventional follow-up by investigating the interval from AHRE onset to physician's evaluation and reaction time in actionable episodes.
Methods and results: A total of 97 dual-chamber pacemaker recipients were followed with RM (RM-ON group; N = 64) or conventional in-office visits (RM-OFF group; N = 33) for 18 months. In-office visits were scheduled at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months in the RM-OFF group and at 1 and 18 months in the RM-ON group. The overall AHRE rate was 1.98 per patient-year (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76-2.20) with no difference between the two groups (RM-ON vs. RM-OFF weighted-HR, 0.88; CI, 0.36-2.13; p = .78). In the RM-ON group, 100% AHREs evaluated within 11 days from onset, and within 202 days in the RM-OFF group, with a median evaluation delay 79 days shorter in the RM-ON group versus the RM-OFF group (p < .0001). Therapy adjustment in actionable AHREs occurred 77 days earlier in the RM-ON group versus the control group (p < .001). In the RM-ON group, there were 50% less in-office visits as compared to the RM-OFF group (p < .001).
Conclusions: In our pacemaker population with no history of atrial fibrillation, RM allowed significant reduction of AHRE evaluation delay and prompted treatment of actionable episodes as compared to biannual in-office visit schedule.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; atrial high rate episodes; atrial tachyarrhythmias; pacemaker; remote monitoring.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.