Background: People with unilateral amputation typically walk with greater metabolic cost than able-bodied individuals, while preferring asymmetric walking characteristics. It is unclear if asymmetric walking is energetically optimal and how metabolic cost accounts for asymmetric patterns in people with amputation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of stance-time asymmetry on the metabolic cost of transport.
Methods: Fourteen participants (seven with amputation) completed two laboratory sessions where they walked on a treadmill while receiving real-time visual feedback about stance-time asymmetry. Expired gases were collected to determine the metabolic cost for a range of asymmetries (-15% to +15% in 5% increments, positive percentages represent more time on intact [dominant] limb).
Findings: Participants with amputation walked with greater (P = 0.008) stance-time asymmetry (4.34 ± 1.09%) compared with able-bodied participants (0.94 ± 2.44%). Stance-time asymmetry had a significant effect on metabolic cost (P < 0.001). The asymmetries coinciding with the predicted minimum metabolic cost for people with (3.23 ± 2.90%) and without (1.81 ± 2.18%) amputation were not different from preferred asymmetries (P = 0.365; p = 0.513), respectively. The cost of symmetric walking was 13.6% greater than near preferred walking for people with amputation (5% more time on intact limb).
Interpretation: Metabolic cost is not the only objective of walking, but like able-bodied individuals, it may influence how people with amputation walk. Rehabilitation typically tries to restore inter-limb symmetry after an injury, yet if the limbs are asymmetric, symmetric gait may not be optimal with current assistive devices.
Keywords: Energetics; Gait; Limb loss; Locomotion; Real-time feedback; Rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.