We present an erratum to our Letter [Opt. Lett.47, 802 (2022)10.1364/OL.448571]. This erratum corrects an error in the sign of one of the higher-order dispersion coefficient used in the simulations of Figs. 2 and 4, as well as in Figs. S1 and S3. The simulations in the original Letter were performed using the correct value, and therefore this correction does not affect any of the results and conclusions of the original Letter.