Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin

Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 18:2022:3283211. doi: 10.1155/2022/3283211. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the current study was to evaluate and compare the influence of Dycal, Lime-Lite, TheraCal LC, Biodentine, resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and Activa BioActive as the pulp capping material on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin.

Methods: A total of 70 extracted caries-free molars were randomly assigned to seven groups. Six test groups were covered with various protective liners: Dycal, TheraCal LC, Lime-Lite, Activa BioActive, Biodentine, and RMGIC. The control group received no liner pretreatment. Each sample was bonded to resin composite using the total-etch Tetric N bond adhesive. The samples were then tested for shear bond strength using the universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until bond failure occurred. The data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test followed by the Tamhane post hoc test for pairwise comparisons of the groups.

Results: Independent of the type of the applied liner, all groups exhibited inferior SBS to dentin compared to the control group. TheraCal and RMGIC showed significantly higher shear bond strength than Biodentine and Dycal, which showed the lowest shear bond strength. Lime-Lite and Activa also had significantly lower SBS results than TheraCal. The mode of fracture was predominantly cohesive in Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal and adhesive in Activa.

Conclusion: This present study concludes that the bond strength of resin composite to dentin can be affected differently using various types of liners.

MeSH terms

  • Composite Resins / chemistry
  • Dental Bonding*
  • Dentin
  • Glass Ionomer Cements* / chemistry
  • Materials Testing
  • Molar
  • Resin Cements / chemistry
  • Shear Strength

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Resin Cements