Arthroscopic-Assisted Foveal Reattachment of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears With Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: A Comparison of Suture Anchors and Transosseous Sutures

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically-assisted suture anchor repair and transosseous sutures for repair of foveal triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.

Methods: Sixty patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal detachment associated with DRUJ instability were prospectively recruited and randomized into 2 equal groups-the anchor repair group and the transosseous repair group. The primary outcome was DRUJ function after 2 years, which was assessed by the DRUJ evaluating system. The secondary outcomes were grip strength, visual analog scale for pain, Mayo Modified Wrist ScorePatient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score.

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the outcome measures. Good-to-excellent outcomes (according to the DRUJ evaluation system) were achieved in 27 (90%) patients in the anchor repair group and 26 (86.7%) patients in the transosseous repair group. Fewer complications were observed in the anchor repair group.

Conclusions: Both techniques yielded good and comparable outcomes with a lesser incidence of early complications in the anchor repair group.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.

Keywords: Anchors; arthroscopic repair; distal radioulnar joint instability; foveal; transosseous sutures; triangular fibrocartilage complex.