Composition of the surgical team in aortic arch surgery-a risk factor analysis

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of varying experiences within each surgical team to identify team-related risk factors on clinical outcomes after total aortic arch replacement.

Methods: Each surgeon was rated from 1 to 5, and a surgical team's score was calculated (operating surgeon + assisting surgeon = team score) by relying on each member's experience. A composite end point (mortality, stroke or spinal cord injury) was defined.

Results: Total aortic arch replacement was performed in 264 patients by 19 cardiovascular surgeons. Analysis revealed that the composite end point was attained more frequently when the team score was <7 (n = 23; 29%) than >7 (n = 35; 19%) (P = 0.015). There was a significant difference depending on the surgeon's experience [3 = 23 (35%); 4 = 9 (22%); 5 = 26 (17%); P = 0.008] and whether he was equally experienced (n = 9, 45%) or not as the assisting surgeon (n = 49, 20%; P = 0.015). Logistic regression revealed age >70 years [OR 2.93 (1.52-5.66); P = 0.001], previous stroke [OR 3.02 (1.36-6.70); P = 0.007], acute type A aortic dissection [OR 2.58 (1.08-6.13); P = 0.033], previous acute kidney injury [OR 2.27 (1.01-5.14); P = 0.049] and 2 surgeons with the same experience [OR 4.01 (1.47-10.96); P = 0.007] as predictors for the composite end point.

Conclusions: Total aortic arch replacement is equally safe whether an experienced surgeon carries it out or assists the procedure. A less experienced team may raise the risk for postoperative complications. Our data suggest an association of equally experienced surgeons in a team with worse outcomes than teams possessing different experience levels.

Keywords: Aortic dissection; Arch replacement; Frozen elephant trunk; Redo arch surgery.