Purpose: To determine how differences in frequency of the single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL-SJ) use affect the improvement of upper limb motor function and activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke patients.
Materials and methods: Subacute stroke patients were divided into the high or low frequency of HAL-SJ use groups. The two groups were matched by propensity score, and the degree of changes 30 days after initiating HAL-SJ use was compared. A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine whether frequent use would increase the number of subjects experiencing the efficacy of more than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA).
Results: Twenty-five stroke patients were matched by propensity score, and nine pairs were matched. The high-frequency group showed a significantly superior increase to total FMA shoulder, elbow, forearm, and Barthel index compared with the low-frequency group. Logistic regression analysis revealed no significant associations between frequent use and MCID.
Conclusions: The frequency of HAL-SJ use may affect the improvement of motor function and ADL ability of the upper limb with exception of the fingers and wrist. However, the frequency of intervention was not effective enough to further increase the number of subjects with clinically meaningful changes in upper limb motor function.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe current study aimed to clarify how differences in the frequency of single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL-SJ) use can affect the improvement of upper-limb motor functions and ADL in subacute stroke patients.Our results implied that the frequency of HAL-SJ use may influence the recovery of upper limb function.However, even if HAL-SJ is used frequently, it does not mean that more patients will achieve clinically meaningful recovery.
Keywords: Intervention frequency; hybrid assistive limb; logistic regression analysis; propensity score-matched analysis; stroke; upper limb function.