Postmortem Interrogation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A 15-Year Experience

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;8(3):356-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to define the feasibility and utility of postmortem cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) interrogation.

Background: The diagnostic yield of routine postmortem interrogation of CIEDs including pacemakers, defibrillators, and implantable loop recorders has not been established.

Methods: The study reviewed all CIED interrogations in deceased individuals undergoing medicolegal investigation of sudden or unexplained death by the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine between 2005 and 2020.

Results: A total of 260 patients (68.8% male, median age 72.8 years [interquartile range: 62.7-82.2 years]) underwent CIED interrogation (202 pacemakers, 56 defibrillators, and 2 loop recorders) for investigation of sudden (n = 162) or unexplained (n = 98) death. CIEDs were implanted for median of 2.0 years (interquartile range: 0.7-5.0 years), with 19 devices at elective replacement indicator and 5 at end of life. Interrogation was successful in 256 (98.5%) cases. Potential CIED malfunction was identified in 20 (7.7%) cases, including untreated ventricular arrhythmias (n = 13) and lead failures (n = 3, 2 resulting in untreated ventricular arrhythmia). Interrogation directly informed cause of death in 131 (50.4%) cases. A total of 72 (27.7%) patients had abnormalities recorded in 30 days preceding death: nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 26), rapid atrial fibrillation (n = 17), elective replacement indicator or end-of-life status (n = 22), intrathoracic impedance alarms (n = 3), lead issues (n = 3), or therapy delivered (n = 1). In 6 cases in which the patient was found deceased after a prolonged period, interrogation determined time of death. In 1 case, CIED interrogation was the primary means of patient identification.

Conclusions: Postmortem CIED interrogation frequently contributes important information regarding critical device malfunction, premortem abnormalities, mechanism, and time of death or patient identity. Device interrogation should be considered for select patients with CIEDs undergoing autopsy.

Keywords: cardiac implantable electronic device; forensic; pacemaker; postmortem.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Atrial Fibrillation*
  • Autopsy
  • Defibrillators, Implantable* / adverse effects
  • Electronics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*