Future changes in the risk of compound hot and dry events over China estimated with two large ensembles

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0264980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264980. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Under the context of global warming, compound dry and hot events (CDHEs) will increase and bring serious losses to society and the economy. The projection of CDHEs is of great significance for policy-making and risk assessment. In this paper, two large ensemble simulations, CanESM2-LE and CESM-LE, are used to estimate the risk of extreme CDHEs under different warming scenarios in China. First, the biases of the model in the simulation of the temperature and precipitation over the China region are corrected, and the index of CDHEs is established based on a copula function. The results show that extreme CDHEs will occur more often in China with the increase in global warming and the more severe extreme CDHEs are, the greater the risk will be in the future with higher uncertainties. Events that would be attained once every 50 and 100 years in the current climate from CESM-LE (CAanESM2-LE) will be 1.2/1.6 (1.1/1.5) times and 1.3/2.3 (1.5/2.0) times more likely to occur in a 1.5°C/2.0°C warmer climate, respectively. Northwestern China will experience the greatest increase in the risk of extreme CDHEs. Extreme CDHEs expected once every 100 years in the current period over NW China are expected to occur approximately every 5 and 4 years under a 4.0°C warmer world in CanESM2-LE and CESM-LE, respectively.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • China / epidemiology
  • Climate Change*
  • Climate*
  • Global Warming
  • Hot Temperature

Grants and funding

Z. T is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant 2017YFA0603800), (http://en.most.gov.cn/programmes1/200610/t20061009_36223.htm). T. Y is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant 2018YFC1505805), (http://en.most.gov.cn/programmes1/200610/t20061009_36223.htm). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.