The application of apparent diffusion coefficients derived from intratumoral and peritumoral zones for assessing pathologic prognostic factors in rectal cancer

Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5106-5118. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08717-3. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from intratumoral and peritumoral zones for assessing pathologic prognostic factors in rectal cancer.

Materials and methods: One hundred forty-six patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative MRI were prospectively enrolled. Two radiologists independently placed free-hand regions of interest (ROIs) in the largest tumor cross section and three small ROIs on the peritumoral zone adjacent to the tumor contour. Maximum values of tumor ADC (ADCtmax), minimum values of tumor ADC (ADCtmin), mean values of tumor ADC (ADCtmean), mean values of peritumor ADC (ADCpmean), and ADCpmean/ADCtmean (ADC ratio) were obtained on ADC maps and correlated with prognostic factors using uni- and multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

Results: Interobserver agreement was excellent for ADCtmax and ADCtmean (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.915-0.958), and were good for ADCtmin, ADCpmean, and ADC ratio (ICC, 0.774-0.878). The ADC ratio was significantly higher in the poor differentiation, T3-4 stage, lymph node metastasis (LNM)-positive, extranodal extension (ENE)-positive, tumor deposit (TD)-positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI)-positive groups than that in the well-moderate differentiation, T1-2 stage, LNM-negative, ENE-negative, TD-negative, and LVI-negative groups (p = 0.008, < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the ADC ratio was the highest for assessing poor differentiation (0.700), T3-4 stage (0.707), LNM-positive (0.776), TD-positive (0.848), and LVI-positive (0.778). Both the ADC ratio (AUC = 0.677) and ADCpmean (AUC = 0.686) showed higher diagnostic performance for assessing ENE.

Conclusion: The ADC ratio could provide better predictive performance for assessing preoperative prognostic factors in resectable rectal cancer.

Key points: • Both the peritumor/tumor ADC ratio and ADCpmean are correlated with important prognostic factors of resectable rectal cancer. • Both peritumor ADC and peritumor/tumor ADC ratio had higher diagnostic performance than tumor ADC for assessment of prognostic factors in resectable rectal cancer. • Peritumor/tumor ADC ratio showed the most capability for the assessment of prognostic factors in resectable rectal cancer.

Keywords: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Extranodal extension; Lymphatic metastasis; Rectal neoplasms.

MeSH terms

  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Humans
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Prognosis
  • Rectal Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Rectal Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Retrospective Studies