Self-Organization of Interprofessional Staff to Improve Mobility of Hospitalized Patients with STRIDE: a Complexity Science-Informed Qualitative Study

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4216-4222. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07482-9. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract

Background: Inpatient mobility programs can help older adults maintain function during hospitalization. Changing hospital practice can be complex and require engagement of various staff levels and disciplines; however, we know little about how interprofessional teams organize around implementing such interventions. Complexity science can inform approaches to understanding and improving multidisciplinary collaboration to implement clinical programs.

Objective: To examine, through a complexity science lens, how clinical staff's understanding about roles in promoting inpatient mobility evolved during implementation of the STRIDE (assiSTed eaRly mobIlity for hospitalizeD older vEterans) hospital mobility program.

Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

Participants: Ninety-two clinical staff at eight Veterans Affairs hospitals.

Interventions: STRIDE is a supervised walking program for hospitalized older adults designed to maintain patients' mobility and function.

Approach: We interviewed key staff involved in inpatient mobility efforts at each STRIDE site in pre- and post-implementation periods. Interviews elicited staff's perception of complexity-science aspects of inpatient mobility teams (e.g., roles over time, team composition). We analyzed data using complexity science-informed qualitative content analysis.

Key results: We identified three key themes related to patterns of self-organization: (1) individuals outside of the "core" STRIDE team voluntarily assumed roles as STRIDE advocates, (2) leader-champions adapted their engagement level to match local implementation team needs during implementation, and (3) continued leadership support and physical therapy involvement were key factors for sustainment.

Conclusions: Staff self-organized around implementation of a new clinical program in ways that were responsive to changing program and contextual needs. These findings demonstrate the importance of effective self-organization for clinical program implementation. Researchers and practitioners implementing clinical programs should allow for, and encourage, flexibility in staff roles in planning for implementation of a new clinical program, encourage the development of advocates, and engage leaders in program planning and sustainment efforts.

Keywords: complexity science; implementation science; inpatient mobility; qualitative research.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Humans
  • Leadership
  • Qualitative Research
  • United States
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs*
  • Veterans Health
  • Veterans*