Objectives: The objective of our study was to use laboratory data to describe prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing trends for primary healthcare (PHC) services from a single province. PHC is a basic package of services offered to local communities, serving as the first point of contact within the health system. These services are offered at clinics and community health centres (CHC), the latter providing additional maternity, accident and emergency services.
Design: The retrospective descriptive study design was used.
Methods: We analysed national laboratory data between 2006 and 2016 for men ≥30 years in the Gauteng Province. We used the probabilistic matching algorithm to create first-ever PSA cohort. We used the hot-deck imputation to assign missing race group values and the district health information system facility descriptors to identify PHC testing. We reported patient numbers by calendar year, age category and race group as well as descriptive statistics. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess any association for race group and age with a PSA ≥4 µg/L.
Results: Between 2006 and 2016, numbers of men tested increased from 1782 to 67 025, respectively, with 186 984/239 506 (78.1%) tests were from clinics. The majority of testing was for men in the 50-59 age category (31.5%) and Black Africans (86.4%). We reported a median of 0.9 µg/L that increased with age. A PSA ≥4 µg/L was reported for 11.7% of men, increasing to 35.5% for the ≥70 age category. The logistic regression reported that the adjusted odds of having a PSA ≥4 µg/L was significantly lower for Indian/Asians, multiracials and whites than for Black Africans (p value<0.0001).
Conclusions: Our study has shown a marked increase in PSA testing from clinics and CHC suggestive of screening for prostate cancer. The approaches reported in this study can be extended for national data.
Keywords: chemical pathology; primary care; prostate disease.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.