Background: The main aims of this study were to analyze trends of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid IgG throughout the four rounds of the seroepidemiologic study ENE-COVID, and compare the fourth-round results of two immunoassays detecting anti-nucleocapsid and anti-RBD IgG.
Methods: ENE-COVID was developed in 2020 (two phases). Phase one included three rounds carried out in April 27-May 11, May 18-June 1, and June 8-June 22. Phase two included a fourth round in the same cohort (November 16-29). A chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay was offered to participants in the first three rounds (Abbott; anti-nucleocapsid IgG). In the fourth round, we offered this test and a chemiluminescence immunoassay (Beckman; anti-RBD IgG) to i) a randomly selected sub-cohort, ii) participants who were IgG-positive in any of the three first rounds; and iii) participants who were IgG-positive in the fourth round by point-of-care immunochromatography.
Results: 10,153 individuals (82.2% of people invited) participated in the fourth round. Of them, 2595 (35.1% of participants with results in the four rounds) were positive for anti-nucleocapsid IgG in at least one round. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG became undetectable in 43.3% of participants with positive first-round results. In fourth round, anti-nucleocapsid and anti-RBD IgG were detected in 5.5% (321/5827) and 5.4% (315/5827) participants of the randomly selected sub-cohort, and in 26.6% (867/3261) and 25.9% (846/3261) participants with at least one previous positive result, respectively.
Conclusions: The IgG response is heterogeneous and conditioned by infection severity. A proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infected population may have negative serologic results in the post-infection months.
Keywords: Antibodies; COVID-19; ENE-COVID; SARS-CoV-2; Seroprevalence.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.