Background: Supracondylar humerus fractures are a serious problem in children. The complicated anatomy of the elbow joint necessitates careful assessment of the damage before individually adapting treatment methods. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive treatment of children in Group A in relation to children in Group B. Moreover, the impact of rehabilitation on the function of the affected elbow joint was examined.
Materials and methods: The study enrolled 40 children divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. In Group A, the dominant method of treatment was percutaneous K-wire stabilization. The results demonstrate that the use of this treatment method and the implementation of systematic rehabilitation made it possible to achieve very good results. In Group B, stabilization was performed in less than half of the children and rehabilitation was carried out at home. The initial and follow-up examinations were carried out in both groups according to a medical test card. In Group A, the initial examination was performed on the day the rehabilitation commenced, and the follow-up examination after the completion of a 10-day rehabilitation cycle. In Group B, the initial examination was carried out after immobilization was removed and a follow-up examination was performed after 3 weeks of home-based rehabilitation.
Results: The treatment model used in Group A was more effective than the model used in Group B.
Conclusions: 1. Correct repositioning, the use of percutaneous K-wire stabilization and elbow rehabilitation performed at the earliest possible time give very good functional results. 2. The use of percutaneous stabilization shortens the hospitalization period, which is of great importance in the treatment of young patients.
Keywords: children; mini-invasive surgery; outcomes; supracondylar fractures.