Swimming behavior of emigrating Chinook Salmon smolts

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 15;17(3):e0263972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263972. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Swimming behavior of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts affects transit time, route selection and survival in complex aquatic ecosystems. Behavior quantified at the river reach and junction scale is of particular importance for route selection and predator avoidance, though few studies have developed field-based approaches for quantifying swimming behavior of juvenile migratory fishes at this fine spatial scale. Two-dimensional acoustic fish telemetry at a river junction was combined with a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model to estimate in situ emigration swimming behavior of federally-threatened juvenile Chinook salmon smolts. Fish velocity over ground was estimated from telemetry, while the hydrodynamic model supplied simultaneous, colocated water velocities, with swimming velocity defined by the vector difference of the two velocities. Resulting swimming speeds were centered around 2 body lengths/second, and included distinct behaviors of positive rheotaxis, negative rheotaxis, lateral swimming, and passive transport. Lateral movement increased during the day, and positive rheotaxis increased in response to local hydrodynamic velocities. Swim velocity estimates were sensitive to the combination of vertical shear in water velocities and vertical distribution of fish.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animal Migration / physiology
  • Animals
  • Ecosystem
  • Fishes
  • Rivers
  • Salmon* / physiology
  • Swimming* / physiology
  • Water

Substances

  • Water

Grants and funding

This study received support from the following sources: RH, EG, MT, AR, and NF supported in part by funds from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (https://wildlife.ca.gov), grant P1796017. NF and AR were supported by the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of California, Project CA-D-WFB-2098-H and CA-D-WFB-2467-H, respectively. AR is also supported by the California Trout and Peter B. Moyle Endowment for Coldwater Fish Conservation. RH and EG were also supported by additional funds from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, grants Q1996064 and P1596025. RH also received support from the San Mateo Resource Conservation District. Research activities were additionally supported with funding provided by the Delta Stewardship Council (Award 1469). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There was no additional external funding received for this study.