Existing evidence on the effects of glucose supplementation on cognitive performance appears inconclusive. Metabolic switching offers an approach to explain such incoherent findings based on differences in cognitive functioning after fasting. We propose a new construct, cognitive glucose sensitivity (CGS), which quantifies individual performance gain due to glucose supplementation. We tested the hypothesis that the effects of glucose ingestion depend on CGS, cognitive task domain, and sex. In addition, the relationship between CGS and body mass index (BMI) was examined. Seventy-one participants (48 female) were tested in two conditions each (deprivation baseline vs. glucose supplementation), performing tasks from different cognitive domains (memory and executive functioning). We found significant evidence for a correlation of deprivation baseline performance and CGS across domains (Corsi-Block-Tapping Task: r = -0.57, p < 0.001; Go-No-Go Task: r = 0.39, p = 0.001; word list recall: r = -0.50, p < 0.001). Moreover, individual CGS differed significantly between tasks (p = 0.018). Only in men, BMI was significantly related to CGS in a word recall paradigm (r = 0.49, p = 0.017). Our findings support the notion that the effects of glucose depend on CGS, task domain, and sex. The effort to reduce performance impairment (short-term) might sacrifice independence from external glucose (long term), possibly via declining blood glucose regulation. Therefore, CGS could be regarded as a candidate to enhance our understanding of the etiology of unhealthy eating.
© 2022. The Author(s).